Does The Watching World Not Have A Conscience? - Instablogs
Does The Watching World Not Have A Conscience?
Robb , Derby: Oct 27 2008
Made Popular Oct 28 2008
Zimbabwe :

The treatment of disease is obviously more important than deadly violence… in Zimbabwe, at least.

I was disgusted to read that UNICEF and Mugabe’s ‘government’ have launched an awareness campaign about cholera in Zimbabwe, now that 120 people have died from that disease.

I have no objection to the health organisations and humanitarian bodies looking to prevent further deaths, but what angers me is that we have all of these bodies responding to these deaths - all avoidable if Mugabe had reset his priorities – but what reaction did we have to the political violence earlier this year when somewhere in the region of 130 MDC supporters and activists lost their lives?

I will never criticise any body for looking at educating a population about a killer disease, but find the whole thing lacking when the free world did virtually nothing to stop the violence and killings earlier in the year.

My late father was a consultant in tropical diseases - including leprosy, tuberculosis and cholera. In the late 1970’s, some of you may remember the cholera outbreak in the Sabi area in the Lowveld in Rhodesia. It was my father that oversaw the eradication of the disease at that time.

From my limited understanding, cholera is a terrible disease and an equally terrible death. My heart goes out to the families of those that have died.

Does The Watching World Not Have A Conscience?

But my heart also goes out to those who lost members of their families in the political violence orchestrated by Mugabe-ites earlier this year.

It angers me that international bodies are prepared to look at a preventative programme for the disease of cholera, while the cause for the 130 deaths remains ever-present and in office.

Does the watching world not have a conscience?

Are the activities of Mugabe and his ZANU PF party acceptable to the watching world?

And therein lies the problem - the world SITS and WATCHES…

Robb WJ Ellis
The Bearded Man

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
The treatment of disease is probably more profitable (medicines/doctors). Protracted violence is good for aid (profit), mediators (funding), peacekeepers (funding/arms)...

...the world watches, rubbing its palms, waiting to be called in to help (reap).

No conscience. No justice. Just us.
1 Stars
Alain
Paris, France
Completely agree Harun. The points you have raised are right on the target. But there is no way we can ignore deaths due to treatable diseases like cholera. Still something is done. The world can't shun its duties towards the ill and diseased.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Johan
Pretoria, South Africa
Obviously the world wants to do something about Zimbabwe. Sanctions are not helping the cause of the common Zimbabwean. They are hurting them more than the government. Instead of criticizing the UNICEF channel your energies elsewhere.
1 Stars
Jamie
Birmingham, United Kingdom
@Johan

I will never criticise any body for looking at educating a population about a killer disease, but find the whole thing lacking when the free world did virtually nothing to stop the violence and killings earlier in the year.


He has made it pretty clear, hasn't he?
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Charlene
Portland, United States
Robb,

The world has conscience. There is not much the world can do to change the political situation in Zimbabwe. And precisely because the world has a conscience it has taken the initiative through the Unicef to launch a cholera awareness program.
1 Stars
Olivier
Berne, Switzerland
unfortunately for zimbabwe things look extremely bleak and will continue to be bleak as long as countries such as china and russia supports it.

south africa is also not doing much to help ease the crisis there.

all solution looks pretty complicated.
1 Stars
Robb thebeardedman.blogsp..
Derby, United Kingdom
I wasn’t suggesting that the awareness of disease is not important. What I was trying to say that I found it a little strange that UNICEF should want to react to a disease that has killed 120 people, while the real problem in the country - Mugabe - is responsible for so much more.

I do not question UNICEF on their motives, but do look at the timing only.
1 Stars
Johan
Pretoria, South Africa
Robb, I would give you the benefit of doubt. But when I think of your 'timing' argument then the last three decades were bad timing for the world to do anything for the causes similar to that UNICEF has taken because of Mugabe's rule. Give me a break.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Meital
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Mugabe is a disease that must be tackled first. He is a disease that is killing tens of thousands each year and ailing millions of others that has created an atmosphere of fear so much so that exodus from Zim looks like the only option left for many.
(Global Perspectives)
1 Stars
Robb thebeardedman.blogsp..
Derby, United Kingdom
Timing is everything. Call me suspicious if you will - but I am talking about the tendency of international bodies to launch awareness programmes - when the problem behind the disease is Mugabe himself.

How is it that a ’world leader’ buys luxury motor vehicles instead of spending that money on medical supplies and services?

You may think that I am looking for an excuse, but when it comes to Mugabe, it doesn’t take much looking - and I don’t need an excuse.
Add your Comment