Theft From Anyone For Any Reason Is Still Theft - Instablogs
Theft From Anyone For Any Reason Is Still Theft
Robb , Derby: Apr 22 2009
Made Popular Apr 23 2009
Zimbabwe :

I wouldn’t normally write three of these things in three consecutive days - unless events in Zimbabwe warranted it.

And this afternoon I happened upon an article which shouted at me, “Let people know!

It was a report on the fact that Gideon Gono’s Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe had stolen money from the account of Hivo’s - a Dutch development organisation.

Theft From Anyone For Any Reason Is Still Theft

According to the article, Gono pointed out that, “The unorthodox measures helped keep the country afloat.”

Really?

At least we now know why the IMF and the World Bank have been reluctant to release any money to Mugabe’s administration - mainly because it has a habit of disappearing and all manner of excuses are given to justify the disappearance.

The report goes on to say that some of the money has been replaced - but not all of it.

Now - theft is theft, no matter who from and for whatever reason. And no matter what the value of the stolen property.

No reason can justify the removal of the money from this account without the account holder’s permission.

But just who has committed this theft?

In a word - Mugabe. Compounded by Gono. That does not, however lessen his guilt. Mugabe’s policies have made extraordinary and unorthodox measures necessary for the country to remain viable. (Personally I no longer believe that it is viable, but that is a moot point…)

Whoever instigated the order to execute the theft is primarily responsible, and each person down the line to the actual computer operator that extracted the finance is guilty of an offence - although less of the blame has to be put on the more junior ranks. Gono would have reacted to a mutiny against his orders with the immediate sacking of the individual concerned - and possible incarceration.

Sometimes the floor worker has to do the dirty work just to keep their own heads above water.

Gono attempts to excuse the theft by saying the country’s plight necessitated the use of the money. Theft is theft. Plain and simple. And for this reason, Gono and his primary task master are guilty of a crime.

The money was never theirs’ to use - and there was no permissions to use the money.

The money was lodged with the bank on promise that the bank would protect that deposit - which they have failed to do. Gono should pay, not only with his job, but he should be prosecuted for this and so many more similar crimes where foreign currency has been ‘liberated’ by the bank for their own use.

And I am sure that the numbers, money wise, would be mind-boggling, whilst the numbers, crime wise, would make our heads spin.

Gono has been driven to distraction in his daily need to please and pacify his principal, Robert Gabriel Mugabe.

In any other country in the world, the law would not wait - and these two perpetrators would find themselves staring out at the world from a barred window…

But, because it is Mugabe and everyone seems to be afraid to anger him - in case he takes them to task in one of his numerous rambling speeches - so they allow the matter go unpunished and excuse his behaviour for yet another day.

Robb WJ Ellis
The Bearded Man

Add Images and Videos
Close X
Recommended Tags or Keywords
Search by Tags or Keywords
Selected Media ( You can Upload only Six media )
Sorry no picture found for this combination of tags. Try to search minimum number of tags at once
1 Stars
Wonda L
Earth, Canada
There are differences between thefts and some are justified for the betterment of humanity and has been done many times in the name of religion and good government
What is theft to one is survival by another
When people don’t like something they show their bias or hypocrisy
Nature has on limits or morality
1 Stars
Robb thebeardedman.blogsp..
Derby, United Kingdom
Whilst I realise that one needs to consider the humanity of an action, in this instance, the money has not been used to improve the plight of Zimbabweans.

If it was used in the name of humanity then it could perhaps be justified - but Mugabe/Gono does nothing in the name of humanity.

I might be showing my anti-Mugabe bias, but in this case in particular, it is wholly justified.
1 Stars
Wonda L
Earth, Canada
Robb
I am not saying by the terms of emotion it is right, but my analogy was that nature forces peope to gather or be on the top for the success of their gens and nothing surprises me as to what us human wouldn’t do because of our natural drive
Now i could give bull reasons for his actions but it would go on deaf ears
To change what the lower level humans in the breeding cycle want- we would have to restart evolution and not have nature make the rules
Sorry for truth, but nature blinds humans to truth -so it is ok
2 Stars
Robb thebeardedman.blogsp..
Derby, United Kingdom
I understand where you are coming from. My basic anti-Mugabe bias stems from the treatment I received whilst a member of the ZRP - and then the removal of farm land from my family, by force.

Obviously these things need to be taken into consideration when we analyse opinions.

No need to apologise... I see nothing wrong in your logic.

I draw from experience of Mugabe - first hand - and I know what he is capable of...
1 Stars
Wonda L
Earth, Canada
ROBB
Sorry i didn’t realizes it was that personal and do understand your reasons for your emotion
My point was that this world is a mess and won’t change unless we humans have a major makeover
Be well and hope life treats you better-
Wayne
(Global Perspectives)
Add your Comment